« Former Iraqi Minister says Hussein's regime used jihadist groups to counter Shi'ites | Main | An Al-Tikriti (Saddam Hussein's clan) speaking for al Qaeda cell in Europe? »

Secular Baathist/Islamic extremist divide overcome repeatedly in Iraq

For a regime long said to be sharply opposed to radical Islamic groups the secular Baath Party that formerly ruled Iraq has seen a conspicuously large number of its members caught in close collaboration with al Qaeda and other Islamic groups in post-invasion Iraq.

A recent arrest in Mosul identified a former Saddam Fedayeen leader as an insurgent leader responsible for al Qaeda/foreign fighter camps in Syria.

On March 23, the Tactical Report, an online Middle East intelligence service, reported that a former Saddam Hussein officer was appointed as an al Qaeda leader to set up attacks on Iraqi oil sites.

In addition to these "new converts" a number of older stories on the same topic were passed along to www.regimeofterror.com.

One story, from the Arabic newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat translated by a reader at Powerlineblog notes that one of the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's top men, Omar Hadid, was a former personal body guard of Saddam Hussein and had trained with al Qaeda in Afghanistan before fighting against coalition forces in Fallujah and elsewhere. Hadid, according to an al Qaeda biography after his death, also had a relative who was an official for Iraq's Intelligence Services and worked with Hadid on postwar operations. It should also be noted that, according to Knight-Ridder news services, Hadid's background included outright conflicts with Saddam Hussein's regime though he testified to the country's move away from secular restraints after the first Gulf War.

As previously detailed in a piece at The American Thinker by Ray Robison, the fighting in Fallujah a number of years back also saw the teaming up of many members of Saddam Hussein's former Republican Guard and foreign and domestic jihadist fighters.

Reportedly there were "scores of men" like Abu Mustafa (who) was one former military officer who told TIME that he spent his time in jail (post-invasion) "studying Salafi Islam and receiving lessons in jihad from bearded Iraqis and detainees who came from places like Syria and Saudi Arabia" before joining the jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Abu Ali was “Among those who have thrown their support behind the jihad is insurgent leader Abu Ali. A ballistic-missile specialist in Saddam's Fedayeen militia, he fought U.S. troops during the invasion and has served as a resistance commander ever since, organizing rocket attacks on the green zone, the headquarters of the U.S. administration in Baghdad. When interviewed by TIME last fall, he spoke of a vain hope that Saddam would return and re-establish a Baathist regime.” How Ali pictured a "secular" leader tolerating the type of violent Islamic extremism that Ali and others had helped spread in Iraq is quite a paradox.

One of the many anti coalition groups fighting in Iraq, called "Battalions of Islamic Holy War",
whose leaders also met with TIME magazine, was "founded by frontline officers from Saddam's intelligence services and the Republican Guard who once shunned terrorist attacks that killed innocent Iraqis" later represented a "significant Iraqi wing of al-Zarqawi's network." The Senate Intelligence Committee's report in 2004 revealed some intelligence that predicted these sorts of relationships.

These additions add to an already sizeable list of ex-Baathists/Saddam loyalists who sided with Islamic/jihadist fighters and al Qaeda in Iraq. While it is certainly possible that many of these religious conversions and new relationships were initiated post-invasion, drawn together by the common enemy of U.S. led forces in Iraq, it is unlikely that the countless (likely hundreds) remnants of Hussein's secular regime did not have at least some kind of a foundation for a relationship with these groups prior to March 2003. The type of trust and confidence necessary to give assets including money, weapons, arms, safehouses and training and reciprocal placement of Baathists into al Qaeda leadership positions only leads an outside observer to conclude that the two sides shared common grievances, common goals and common beliefs.

It has been 4 years since Operation Iraqi Freedom began and many of these relations that have been discovered post-invasion give cause for re-thinking prewar assumptions that secular Baathists wouldn't cooperate with Islamic militant/terrorist groups, just as some in the government had predicted as being possible prior to invasion, contrasting the conventional wisdom of then and now.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://regimeofterror.com/cms/mt-tb.cgi/79

Comments (4)

Rodney A Stanton:

Which is why , in retrospect, it is clear we should have supported the troops as Gen Zinni'a plan would have. Had we sent 2 battleships over in 03 we would have killed between 500,000 and 700,000 Iraqui men in uniform by 11/04 and the war would have been won.
Instead we let them go, hide their uniforms, keep their weapons and ammunition to kill the allies and Iraquis who help us.
What is worse is that if we are going to win the war now the MSM/DNC will say we are killing civilians since they have not worn their uniforms for 3 years.
Which is why Newt was right 2 years ago when he said Rummy had no idea how to win a war and should be replaced. We still are not supporting the troops as we have yet to get any battle ships out of mothballs. Unfortunately we are as McCain said a month ago wasting American lives in a war our President clearly does not want to win. A war we could have won 2.6 years ago if we had just supported the troops!

The real question is why did the President start a war he clearly never wanted to win?
In 05 my answer was it wins elections - as it did in 02 + 04. But it clearly lost the election in 06 - and lot bigger than the tiny wins in 02 and 04. So why not either win the war or get out?

Jackalope:

"...and reciprocal placement of Baathists into al Qaeda leadership positions..."

Yeah, like this guy.

Good article over at Front Page, Ike. But why do you link to Juan Cole?

drzz:

About this subject, I think you begin to learn early that something is wrong with the new “official” version of the CIA about Saddam links with terror,

The fact they claim Saddam’s regime was secular is ridiculous. So why do they claim such things ?

Because when you want to bury a story, you begin to ruin the first link that could explain a relationship between Iraq and Al-Quaeda.

If Syria launched today a terrorist attack with Hezbullah againt Los Angeles, after Pelosi visited Damascus, the US establishment would act exactly the same way :

1) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Syria is sunni, Huzbollah Shi’ah.

2) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Syria is baathist, and baathism, in theory, is secular.

3) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, Assad fears the extremists and claims in public that he despises them.

4) Syria cannot support Hezbullah, the Hezbullah tries to create an islamic state that would erase Assad’s power from Syria.

BUT, as we all know, Syria DOES support Hezbullah, because they have the same enemy in common, because states always look for allies, especially the isolated states (as was Saddam). It is like saying the US could never have supported the communism during WWII because they didn’t share the same ideology.

This is ri-di-cu-lous. But that’s what the MSM, the 9/11 commission, the US government and the CIA say to the US people.

!!!!!!!!!! SEE THE VIDEO !!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1sx7x_saddams-secrets

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 8, 2007 11:28 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Former Iraqi Minister says Hussein's regime used jihadist groups to counter Shi'ites.

The next post in this blog is An Al-Tikriti (Saddam Hussein's clan) speaking for al Qaeda cell in Europe?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Resources:

Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33
Hosted by
Hosting Matters

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.